drosophila melanogaster embryo s2 cells Search Results


97
ATCC drosophila cell line schneider s2
(A) Schematic representation of the Faf constructs used in this study. Numbers denote amino acid position. USP DUB domain is represented in green. (B) Faf binds to Ft. HA-tagged Ft ICD was co-expressed with FLAG-tagged GFP or Faf LD (B) in <t>Drosophila</t> <t>S2</t> cells. Cells were lysed and lysates were subjected to co-immunoprecipitation using FLAG agarose beads. Lysates were analysed by immunoblot using the indicated antibodies for detection of protein expression and co-purification. Tubulin (Tub) was used as loading control. (C, D) Faf regulates Ft protein levels in Drosophila S2 cells. (C) HA-tagged Ft ICD was expressed in S2 cells in the presence or absence of Faf LD . 48h after transfection, cells were lysed and lysates were analysed by immunoblot using the indicated antibodies. Ø represents expression of empty vector. (D) S2 cells were treated with the indicated dsRNAs 24h before co-transfection with the indicated constructs. Ft ICD protein levels were analysed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies 48h after cell transfection. GFP and Tubulin (Tub) were used as transfection and loading control, respectively. (E-J) Faf regulates Ft protein levels in vivo . Shown are XY confocal micrographs of third instar wing imaginal discs expressing the indicated constructs under the control of hh-Gal4 , showing Ft antibody staining (E-J and red in E’’-J’’), Arm antibody staining (E’-J’ and cyan in E’’-J’’), and direct fluorescence from GFP (green in E’’-J’’ merged images). Compared to the controls (E, lacZ RNAi ), faf depletion (F) and faf over-expression (G) resulted in a decrease or increase in Ft protein levels, respectively. Shown are also ft RNAi (H) and ft over-expression (I) controls to validate antibody specificity. Depletion of faf in the presence of ft over-expression resulted in a mild decrease in Ft protein levels (J). Ventral is up in XY sections, whilst GFP marks the hh-Gal4 -expressing posterior compartment (right). Dashed white line depicts boundary between anterior and posterior compartments. Scale bar represents 50 μm.
Drosophila Cell Line Schneider S2, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/drosophila+melanogaster+embryo+s2+cells/Schneider's+Drosophila+Line+2/bio_rxiv__2024__01__27__577535-242-6-15
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
drosophila cell line schneider s2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Expression Systems Inc drosophila s2 cells
(A) Schematic representation of the Faf constructs used in this study. Numbers denote amino acid position. USP DUB domain is represented in green. (B) Faf binds to Ft. HA-tagged Ft ICD was co-expressed with FLAG-tagged GFP or Faf LD (B) in <t>Drosophila</t> <t>S2</t> cells. Cells were lysed and lysates were subjected to co-immunoprecipitation using FLAG agarose beads. Lysates were analysed by immunoblot using the indicated antibodies for detection of protein expression and co-purification. Tubulin (Tub) was used as loading control. (C, D) Faf regulates Ft protein levels in Drosophila S2 cells. (C) HA-tagged Ft ICD was expressed in S2 cells in the presence or absence of Faf LD . 48h after transfection, cells were lysed and lysates were analysed by immunoblot using the indicated antibodies. Ø represents expression of empty vector. (D) S2 cells were treated with the indicated dsRNAs 24h before co-transfection with the indicated constructs. Ft ICD protein levels were analysed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies 48h after cell transfection. GFP and Tubulin (Tub) were used as transfection and loading control, respectively. (E-J) Faf regulates Ft protein levels in vivo . Shown are XY confocal micrographs of third instar wing imaginal discs expressing the indicated constructs under the control of hh-Gal4 , showing Ft antibody staining (E-J and red in E’’-J’’), Arm antibody staining (E’-J’ and cyan in E’’-J’’), and direct fluorescence from GFP (green in E’’-J’’ merged images). Compared to the controls (E, lacZ RNAi ), faf depletion (F) and faf over-expression (G) resulted in a decrease or increase in Ft protein levels, respectively. Shown are also ft RNAi (H) and ft over-expression (I) controls to validate antibody specificity. Depletion of faf in the presence of ft over-expression resulted in a mild decrease in Ft protein levels (J). Ventral is up in XY sections, whilst GFP marks the hh-Gal4 -expressing posterior compartment (right). Dashed white line depicts boundary between anterior and posterior compartments. Scale bar represents 50 μm.
Drosophila S2 Cells, supplied by Expression Systems Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/drosophila+melanogaster+embryo+s2+cells/S2+Cells/pm24361577-114-21-18
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
drosophila s2 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
ATCC 2007 drosophila melanogaster s2 cells
(A) Schematic representation of the Faf constructs used in this study. Numbers denote amino acid position. USP DUB domain is represented in green. (B) Faf binds to Ft. HA-tagged Ft ICD was co-expressed with FLAG-tagged GFP or Faf LD (B) in <t>Drosophila</t> <t>S2</t> cells. Cells were lysed and lysates were subjected to co-immunoprecipitation using FLAG agarose beads. Lysates were analysed by immunoblot using the indicated antibodies for detection of protein expression and co-purification. Tubulin (Tub) was used as loading control. (C, D) Faf regulates Ft protein levels in Drosophila S2 cells. (C) HA-tagged Ft ICD was expressed in S2 cells in the presence or absence of Faf LD . 48h after transfection, cells were lysed and lysates were analysed by immunoblot using the indicated antibodies. Ø represents expression of empty vector. (D) S2 cells were treated with the indicated dsRNAs 24h before co-transfection with the indicated constructs. Ft ICD protein levels were analysed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies 48h after cell transfection. GFP and Tubulin (Tub) were used as transfection and loading control, respectively. (E-J) Faf regulates Ft protein levels in vivo . Shown are XY confocal micrographs of third instar wing imaginal discs expressing the indicated constructs under the control of hh-Gal4 , showing Ft antibody staining (E-J and red in E’’-J’’), Arm antibody staining (E’-J’ and cyan in E’’-J’’), and direct fluorescence from GFP (green in E’’-J’’ merged images). Compared to the controls (E, lacZ RNAi ), faf depletion (F) and faf over-expression (G) resulted in a decrease or increase in Ft protein levels, respectively. Shown are also ft RNAi (H) and ft over-expression (I) controls to validate antibody specificity. Depletion of faf in the presence of ft over-expression resulted in a mild decrease in Ft protein levels (J). Ventral is up in XY sections, whilst GFP marks the hh-Gal4 -expressing posterior compartment (right). Dashed white line depicts boundary between anterior and posterior compartments. Scale bar represents 50 μm.
2007 Drosophila Melanogaster S2 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/drosophila+melanogaster+embryo+s2+cells/JB6+Cl+30-7b/pmc02553641-113-7-32
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
2007 drosophila melanogaster s2 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Thermo Fisher drosophila schneider 2 s2 cells
(A) Schematic representation of the Faf constructs used in this study. Numbers denote amino acid position. USP DUB domain is represented in green. (B) Faf binds to Ft. HA-tagged Ft ICD was co-expressed with FLAG-tagged GFP or Faf LD (B) in <t>Drosophila</t> <t>S2</t> cells. Cells were lysed and lysates were subjected to co-immunoprecipitation using FLAG agarose beads. Lysates were analysed by immunoblot using the indicated antibodies for detection of protein expression and co-purification. Tubulin (Tub) was used as loading control. (C, D) Faf regulates Ft protein levels in Drosophila S2 cells. (C) HA-tagged Ft ICD was expressed in S2 cells in the presence or absence of Faf LD . 48h after transfection, cells were lysed and lysates were analysed by immunoblot using the indicated antibodies. Ø represents expression of empty vector. (D) S2 cells were treated with the indicated dsRNAs 24h before co-transfection with the indicated constructs. Ft ICD protein levels were analysed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies 48h after cell transfection. GFP and Tubulin (Tub) were used as transfection and loading control, respectively. (E-J) Faf regulates Ft protein levels in vivo . Shown are XY confocal micrographs of third instar wing imaginal discs expressing the indicated constructs under the control of hh-Gal4 , showing Ft antibody staining (E-J and red in E’’-J’’), Arm antibody staining (E’-J’ and cyan in E’’-J’’), and direct fluorescence from GFP (green in E’’-J’’ merged images). Compared to the controls (E, lacZ RNAi ), faf depletion (F) and faf over-expression (G) resulted in a decrease or increase in Ft protein levels, respectively. Shown are also ft RNAi (H) and ft over-expression (I) controls to validate antibody specificity. Depletion of faf in the presence of ft over-expression resulted in a mild decrease in Ft protein levels (J). Ventral is up in XY sections, whilst GFP marks the hh-Gal4 -expressing posterior compartment (right). Dashed white line depicts boundary between anterior and posterior compartments. Scale bar represents 50 μm.
Drosophila Schneider 2 S2 Cells, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/drosophila+melanogaster+embryo+s2+cells/SUCROSE+EP%2FBP%2FNF+12KG/pmc08382196-165-1-16
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
drosophila schneider 2 s2 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
STARR Life Sciences starr-seq summits

Starr Seq Summits, supplied by STARR Life Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/drosophila+melanogaster+embryo+s2+cells/starr+seq+summits/pmc09026571-3-0-0
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
starr-seq summits - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Protein Sciences Inc drosophila s2 cells

Drosophila S2 Cells, supplied by Protein Sciences Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/drosophila+melanogaster+embryo+s2+cells/cell+expressf+insect+line/us12442018-523-62-56
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
drosophila s2 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
ATCC s2 schizosaccharomices pombe

S2 Schizosaccharomices Pombe, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/drosophila+melanogaster+embryo+s2+cells/Saccharomyces+cerevisiae%3B+S288C/pmc05823473__ppat__1006850__s015-0-17-20
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
s2 schizosaccharomices pombe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
ATCC drosophila s2 cell line

Drosophila S2 Cell Line, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/drosophila+melanogaster+embryo+s2+cells/D%2E+Mel%2E+(2)%3B+Embryo%3B+Fruit+Fly/pmc08428331-88-0-5
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
drosophila s2 cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
ATCC cell lines hamster cho cells atcc crl 11268 d melanogaster cell line s2 s2 drsc laboratory

Cell Lines Hamster Cho Cells Atcc Crl 11268 D Melanogaster Cell Line S2 S2 Drsc Laboratory, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/drosophila+melanogaster+embryo+s2+cells/293T%2F17%3B+Embryonic+Kidney%3B+Human/10__2139_slash_ssrn__3996393-726-58-63
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cell lines hamster cho cells atcc crl 11268 d melanogaster cell line s2 s2 drsc laboratory - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
ATCC schneider s2 drosophila cell line

Schneider S2 Drosophila Cell Line, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/drosophila+melanogaster+embryo+s2+cells/TIBx%3B+Epithelial+liver%3B+Mouse/us07687465-315-1-6
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
schneider s2 drosophila cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
PluriCell s2 drosophila cells
KEY RESOURCES TABLE
S2 Drosophila Cells, supplied by PluriCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/drosophila+melanogaster+embryo+s2+cells/s2+drosophila+cells/pmc11551524-70-0-5
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
s2 drosophila cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ibidi GmbH ibidi pump system
KEY RESOURCES TABLE
Ibidi Pump System, supplied by ibidi GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/drosophila+melanogaster+embryo+s2+cells/ibidi+pump+system/pmc10545883__DataSheet2-1268-6-10
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ibidi pump system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) Schematic representation of the Faf constructs used in this study. Numbers denote amino acid position. USP DUB domain is represented in green. (B) Faf binds to Ft. HA-tagged Ft ICD was co-expressed with FLAG-tagged GFP or Faf LD (B) in Drosophila S2 cells. Cells were lysed and lysates were subjected to co-immunoprecipitation using FLAG agarose beads. Lysates were analysed by immunoblot using the indicated antibodies for detection of protein expression and co-purification. Tubulin (Tub) was used as loading control. (C, D) Faf regulates Ft protein levels in Drosophila S2 cells. (C) HA-tagged Ft ICD was expressed in S2 cells in the presence or absence of Faf LD . 48h after transfection, cells were lysed and lysates were analysed by immunoblot using the indicated antibodies. Ø represents expression of empty vector. (D) S2 cells were treated with the indicated dsRNAs 24h before co-transfection with the indicated constructs. Ft ICD protein levels were analysed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies 48h after cell transfection. GFP and Tubulin (Tub) were used as transfection and loading control, respectively. (E-J) Faf regulates Ft protein levels in vivo . Shown are XY confocal micrographs of third instar wing imaginal discs expressing the indicated constructs under the control of hh-Gal4 , showing Ft antibody staining (E-J and red in E’’-J’’), Arm antibody staining (E’-J’ and cyan in E’’-J’’), and direct fluorescence from GFP (green in E’’-J’’ merged images). Compared to the controls (E, lacZ RNAi ), faf depletion (F) and faf over-expression (G) resulted in a decrease or increase in Ft protein levels, respectively. Shown are also ft RNAi (H) and ft over-expression (I) controls to validate antibody specificity. Depletion of faf in the presence of ft over-expression resulted in a mild decrease in Ft protein levels (J). Ventral is up in XY sections, whilst GFP marks the hh-Gal4 -expressing posterior compartment (right). Dashed white line depicts boundary between anterior and posterior compartments. Scale bar represents 50 μm.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: The deubiquitylating enzyme Fat Facets modulates Fat signalling and regulates tissue growth

doi: 10.1101/2024.01.27.577535

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic representation of the Faf constructs used in this study. Numbers denote amino acid position. USP DUB domain is represented in green. (B) Faf binds to Ft. HA-tagged Ft ICD was co-expressed with FLAG-tagged GFP or Faf LD (B) in Drosophila S2 cells. Cells were lysed and lysates were subjected to co-immunoprecipitation using FLAG agarose beads. Lysates were analysed by immunoblot using the indicated antibodies for detection of protein expression and co-purification. Tubulin (Tub) was used as loading control. (C, D) Faf regulates Ft protein levels in Drosophila S2 cells. (C) HA-tagged Ft ICD was expressed in S2 cells in the presence or absence of Faf LD . 48h after transfection, cells were lysed and lysates were analysed by immunoblot using the indicated antibodies. Ø represents expression of empty vector. (D) S2 cells were treated with the indicated dsRNAs 24h before co-transfection with the indicated constructs. Ft ICD protein levels were analysed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies 48h after cell transfection. GFP and Tubulin (Tub) were used as transfection and loading control, respectively. (E-J) Faf regulates Ft protein levels in vivo . Shown are XY confocal micrographs of third instar wing imaginal discs expressing the indicated constructs under the control of hh-Gal4 , showing Ft antibody staining (E-J and red in E’’-J’’), Arm antibody staining (E’-J’ and cyan in E’’-J’’), and direct fluorescence from GFP (green in E’’-J’’ merged images). Compared to the controls (E, lacZ RNAi ), faf depletion (F) and faf over-expression (G) resulted in a decrease or increase in Ft protein levels, respectively. Shown are also ft RNAi (H) and ft over-expression (I) controls to validate antibody specificity. Depletion of faf in the presence of ft over-expression resulted in a mild decrease in Ft protein levels (J). Ventral is up in XY sections, whilst GFP marks the hh-Gal4 -expressing posterior compartment (right). Dashed white line depicts boundary between anterior and posterior compartments. Scale bar represents 50 μm.

Article Snippet: Work involved the use of the Drosophila cell line Schneider S2 (RRID:CVCL_Z232), obtained from the ATCC and screened for mycoplasma presence, showing no contamination.

Techniques: Construct, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Expressing, Copurification, Control, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Cotransfection, In Vivo, Staining, Fluorescence, Over Expression

(A-C) Faf regulates Ft protein levels in vivo in a DUB-dependent manner. Shown are XY confocal micrographs of third instar wing imaginal discs expressing the indicated constructs under the control of hh-Gal4 , showing Ft antibody staining (A-C and red in A’’-C’’), Arm antibody staining (A’-C’ and cyan in A’’-C’’), and direct fluorescence from GFP (green in A’’-C’’ merged images). Compared to the controls (A, lacZ RNAi ), over-expression of WT faf (B), but not of catalytically inactive faf ( faf CD , C), resulted in an increase in Ft protein levels. Ventral is up in XY sections, whilst GFP marks the hh-Gal4 -expressing posterior compartment (right). Dashed white line depicts boundary between anterior and posterior compartments. Scale bar represents 50 μm. (D-F) Quantification of in vivo Arm and Ft protein levels. Shown are the posterior/anterior (P/A) ratios for Fat protein levels (D), Arm protein levels (E), as well as the normalised Ft protein levels (F, normalised to the respective Arm levels). Data are shown as average ± standard deviation, with all data points represented. n=7, 12, 23 and 18 for lacZ RNAi , faf , faf WT and faf CD , respectively. Significance was assessed using a one-way ANOVA comparing all genotypes to the respective control ( hh>lacZ RNAi ), with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001. (G-J) Regulation of Ft protein levels in Drosophila S2 cells is mediated by the DUB activity of Faf. (G) HA-tagged Ft ICD was co-expressed with and V5-tagged Faf (WT or a catalytically inactive version, CD) in Drosophila S2 cells. Cells were lysed and lysates were analysed by immunoblot using the indicated antibodies for detection of protein expression. Tubulin was used as loading control. (H) Quantification of effect of Faf catalytic activity Ft protein levels in S2 cells. Shown are the relative Ft protein levels (fold change relative to controls, which were set to 1 in cells transfected with empty plasmid (ø); Ft protein levels were normalised to their respective Tubulin control) quantified from Western blot experiments where Faf was over-expressed. Data are represented as average ± standard deviation, with all data points represented. n=3 independent experiments. Significance was assessed by a one-way ANOVA comparing all samples to the respective control (ø), with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test or an unpaired t-test. *, p<0.05 **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001. (I) Inhibition of DUB activity affects Ft protein stability. S2 cells were treated with 5 μM of WP1130 for 6 h before cell lysis. Protein levels were analysed by Western blotting using the indicated antibodies after cell lysis. FLAG-tagged GFP and Tubulin (Tub) were used as transfection and loading controls, respectively. (J) Quantification of effect of DUB inhibition on Ft protein levels in S2 cells. Significance was assessed by an unpaired t-test. *, p<0.05.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: The deubiquitylating enzyme Fat Facets modulates Fat signalling and regulates tissue growth

doi: 10.1101/2024.01.27.577535

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A-C) Faf regulates Ft protein levels in vivo in a DUB-dependent manner. Shown are XY confocal micrographs of third instar wing imaginal discs expressing the indicated constructs under the control of hh-Gal4 , showing Ft antibody staining (A-C and red in A’’-C’’), Arm antibody staining (A’-C’ and cyan in A’’-C’’), and direct fluorescence from GFP (green in A’’-C’’ merged images). Compared to the controls (A, lacZ RNAi ), over-expression of WT faf (B), but not of catalytically inactive faf ( faf CD , C), resulted in an increase in Ft protein levels. Ventral is up in XY sections, whilst GFP marks the hh-Gal4 -expressing posterior compartment (right). Dashed white line depicts boundary between anterior and posterior compartments. Scale bar represents 50 μm. (D-F) Quantification of in vivo Arm and Ft protein levels. Shown are the posterior/anterior (P/A) ratios for Fat protein levels (D), Arm protein levels (E), as well as the normalised Ft protein levels (F, normalised to the respective Arm levels). Data are shown as average ± standard deviation, with all data points represented. n=7, 12, 23 and 18 for lacZ RNAi , faf , faf WT and faf CD , respectively. Significance was assessed using a one-way ANOVA comparing all genotypes to the respective control ( hh>lacZ RNAi ), with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001. (G-J) Regulation of Ft protein levels in Drosophila S2 cells is mediated by the DUB activity of Faf. (G) HA-tagged Ft ICD was co-expressed with and V5-tagged Faf (WT or a catalytically inactive version, CD) in Drosophila S2 cells. Cells were lysed and lysates were analysed by immunoblot using the indicated antibodies for detection of protein expression. Tubulin was used as loading control. (H) Quantification of effect of Faf catalytic activity Ft protein levels in S2 cells. Shown are the relative Ft protein levels (fold change relative to controls, which were set to 1 in cells transfected with empty plasmid (ø); Ft protein levels were normalised to their respective Tubulin control) quantified from Western blot experiments where Faf was over-expressed. Data are represented as average ± standard deviation, with all data points represented. n=3 independent experiments. Significance was assessed by a one-way ANOVA comparing all samples to the respective control (ø), with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test or an unpaired t-test. *, p<0.05 **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001. (I) Inhibition of DUB activity affects Ft protein stability. S2 cells were treated with 5 μM of WP1130 for 6 h before cell lysis. Protein levels were analysed by Western blotting using the indicated antibodies after cell lysis. FLAG-tagged GFP and Tubulin (Tub) were used as transfection and loading controls, respectively. (J) Quantification of effect of DUB inhibition on Ft protein levels in S2 cells. Significance was assessed by an unpaired t-test. *, p<0.05.

Article Snippet: Work involved the use of the Drosophila cell line Schneider S2 (RRID:CVCL_Z232), obtained from the ATCC and screened for mycoplasma presence, showing no contamination.

Techniques: In Vivo, Expressing, Construct, Control, Staining, Fluorescence, Over Expression, Standard Deviation, Activity Assay, Western Blot, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Inhibition, Lysis

Journal: STAR Protocols

Article Title: A computational pipeline to visualize DNA-protein binding states using dSMF data

doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101299

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: STARR-seq summits from Drosophila S2 cells , ( ) , https://data.starklab.org/publications/yanez-cuna_genomeRes_2014/S2_peakSummits.txt.

Techniques: Methylation Sequencing, Software

Journal: Molecular Cell

Article Title: BAP1 enhances Polycomb repression by counteracting widespread H2AK119ub1 deposition and chromatin condensation

doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.06.020

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: Drosophila: S2 cell line , ATCC , ATCC CRL-1963.

Techniques: Control, Virus, Recombinant, Transfection, Purification, Extraction, Sequencing, Imaging, Plasmid Preparation, Software

KEY RESOURCES TABLE

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: RNA polymerase II transcription initiation in holo-TFIID-depleted mouse embryonic stem cells

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114791

Figure Lengend Snippet: KEY RESOURCES TABLE

Article Snippet: S2 Drosophila cells , IGBMC PluriCell East platform , N/A.

Techniques: Recombinant, Staining, Protease Inhibitor, Random Hexamer, Imaging, SYBR Green Assay, RNA Extraction, Western Blot, Reverse Transcription, Sample Prep, Control, Cell Counting, Software